| |
The
Picts at War
Like all the Celtic-speaking tribes, the
Picts were a warrior people. Roman records speak of them breaching
Hadrian's Wall to the south of their lands many times, sometimes
in alliance with the Scots and the Britons. It is known that
when not allied against invaders, they regularly fought amongst
themselves, in dynastic struggles between the great tribal
families that supplied the Mormaers (Great Stewards) or under-kings
of the Islands and seven provinces of Pictland. Throughout
the centuries they lived in Scotland, the Picts raided and
fought against invasions by the Romans, Britons, Scots, Angles
and Norsemen.
The Picts' most famous battle was fought
at Dunnichen (Nechtansmere) in Angus on 20th May 685 AD, when
the Northumbrian Angles who had occupied part of Pictland
were defeated, and their king killed. The victor in this battle
was Bridei mac Bili who, like almost all of the Pictish kings,
did not follow his father on the throne, and was not succeeded
by his son (Pictish succession seems to have been through
the female line).
Bridei's victory is regarded by some historians as
laying the basis for the eventual creation of the
Scottish nation. If the Northumbrian King Ecgfrith
had triumphed, Anglian control might have been consolidated
over northern Britain and Scotland might never have
existed. .Many of the Pictish stones show well-equipped
and dignified warriors on horse and foot.(left)
The Benvie Stone, Angus. A Pictish Class II cross
slab which clearly shows two warriors, perhaps kings
or local chiefsIn 736 AD the Picts captured the chief
Scottish stronghold of Dunadd in Argyll, and subjugated
the Kingdom of Dal Riada for a time.
|
|
The Pictish Boar symbol which is found carved into the bedrock
at Dunnadd is believed to have been added arround the time
of the Picts occupation.
The Picts and the Romans
The battle of Mons Graupius in 80 AD, at
a still undiscovered site, between the Romans under Agricola,
and the Caledonians (Picts) under Calgacus, was claimed as
a great victory by the Romans, particularly by the historian
Tacitus who was Agricola's son-in-law and left the only near
contemporary record. The Caledonian confederation was led
by Calgacus (the Swordsman) and Tacitus writes of him saying
this,
"Whenever I consider why we are fighting
and how we have reached this crisis, I have a strong sense
that this day of your splendid rally may mean the dawn of
liberty for the whole of Britain. You have mustered to a man,
and to a man you are free. There are no lands behind us, and
even the sea is menaced by the Roman fleet. The clash of battle
- the hero's glory - has become the safest refuge of the coward.
Battles against Rome have been lost and won before - but never
without hope, we were always there in reserved. We, the choice
flower of Britain, were treasured in her most secret places.
Out of sight of subject shores, we kept even our eyes free
from the defilement of tyranny. We.the last men on earth,
the last of the free, have been shileded till today by the
very remoteness and the seclusion for which we are famed.
We have enjoyed the impressiveness of the unknown. But today
the boundary of Britain is exposed; beyond us lies no nation,
nothing but waves and rocks and the Romans, more deadly still
than they, for you find in them an arrogance which no reasonable
submission can elude. Brigands of the world, they have exhausted
the land by their indiscriminate plunder, and now they ransack
the sea. The wealth of an enemy excites their cupidity, his
poverty their lust of power. East and West have failed to
glut their maw. They are unique in being as violently tepmted
to attack the poor as the wealthy. Robbery, butchery, rapine,
the liars call Empire; they create a desolation and call it
peace".
|
Victory
or not, after 80 AD the Romans kept south of the Forth-Clyde
axis manning the Antonine Wall for two periods c.143–154
AD and another period fifty or so years later. The Antonine
Wall ditch (left)is still clearly visable to this day.
At the time the wall was built the ditch would have
been about 12m accross and 4m deep. Constant attacks
from the north eventually also over-ran the Hadrian's
Wall to the south in 367 AD, the results of what was
known as the "Barbarian Conspiracy" in which
the Picts were joined by Scots from Ireland and Saxons
from Europe. |
The Romans were unsuccessful in their
attempts to conquer the areas of the Picts and other than
in trade it is difficult to discern what influence they actually
had in Scotland. This has tended to be overlooked due to the
dominant influence Roman culture had in England.
The Picts and the Scots
It is generally said that the Scots arrived
from Ireland into Argyll circa 500 AD though communication
between Scotland and Ireland was long established even then.
Relationships between the Picts and Scots for the next four
centuries varied - at times there was open conflict and at
other times intermarriage at a dynastic level, with some kings
ruling over both peoples for a time before the eventual amalgamation
of the two kingdoms in the 680s.
Under the influence of St. Columba in particular
Dalriada became actively involved in expanding its power base
in Scotland from the capital Dunadd.
|
The commanding
view from the hillfort of Dunadd, Argyll (left). The
Scots spoke Q-Celtic, like modern Gaelic and Irish,
and the Picts spoke P-Celtic, like Welsh but their societies
were in many ways similar. Both were tribal warrior
societies and had never been subjugated by the Romans.
As early as 558 AD the king of Dal Riata, Gabran is
noted to have made a 'forced withdrawal' from Pictland.
|
The seventh century was notable for a great
deal of dynastic and external struggle in both kingdoms. By
the middle of the 8th century Oengus was King of the Picts
and set out to control Dalriada. In this he was successful
but in the 770s Dalriada broke away again under Aed Finn.
Sadly we know little of what happened in the early 9th century
but in the 860s the two kingdoms became permanently united
under the leadership of the Dalriadan Kenneth MacAlpin who
may have had a Pictish mother. Earlier Scottish kings such
as Constantine son of Fergus (Castantin son of Uurguist, to
the Picts) at the turn of the ninth century and his successor
Oengus II (Unuist son of Uurguist) had ruled over both kingdoms
suggesting a gradual amalgamation of dynastic lines rather
than outright conquest by Macalpin.
The Picts and the Britons
In Dark Age Scotland the Picts had different
British peoples as neighbours. Their designation as British
is due to the fact they are believed to have spoken a P-Celtic
language close to Modern Welsh. Other tribal peoples lived
in the area between Stirling and Lothian known as Manau Gododdin
and in what was to become the Kingdom of Strathclyde, stretching
from Dumbarton to Carlisle. The earliest indigenous record
we have in Scotland is in a poem called the Gododdin describing
a tragic expedition by warriors of that tribe to a place called
Catraeth, read by many as Catterick in Yorkshire.
An early Welsh poem called Y Gododdin has
survived telling of a raid to the south by a band of warriors
from Manau Guotodin, roughly the area between modern Stirling
and Edinburgh. The Gododdin were a group British tribes. Who
spoke an early form of Welsh and it seems likely that they
were descended, like the Picts, from the earlier people the
Romans had called Caledonians. The first historical reference
to them is in Ptolemy's map of the late 1st century AD which
calls them Votadini. We should bear in mind that one early
Roman reference talks of Caledonians and other Picts, the
possibility being that Picts in this case was a generic term
for all of the peoples north of the Forth-Clyde line. However
most scholars see the Gododdin as being British, or Brythonnic
and more closely related to the Britons of Strathclyde than
the Picts.
The poem itself tells of a virtually suicidal
attack on the Angles to the south in which almost the entire
warband of 200 men was wiped out. Within a generation or two
of this disaster, which is generally thought to have taken
place near modern Catterick in Yorkshire, Manau Goutodin had
disappeared. By 640 AD the area was under the control of the
Northumbrian Angles. The survival of the poem in Welsh literature
points up the complicated situation in Scotland after the
Romans and several scholars have suggested that the poem itself
was composed in Pictland.
The Picts too spoke a P-Celtic form of language,
probably very close indeed to that of the Gododdin. There
is mention of Pictish warriors in the poem which is also notable
for the earliest reference to that greatest of British heroes,
Arthur.
In the period up to the seventh century the
tribal warrior confederacies of the British Isles were beginning
to form into early kingdoms and there were many battles between
contending groups both within and between the different tribal
confederacies. As with the Scots, the Picts seem to have had
kinship relationships with the Strathclyde dynasty. During
the period of Pictish near-subjection by the Northumbrians
after 672 AD, the uncle of the King of the Picts, Bridei mac
Bile - Owen of Strathclyde - had success in battle against
the Scots. It is also quite likely that at some point in the
seventh century Strathclyde held the overkingship of Pictland
due to the intermingled dynastic arrangements of the various
kingdoms. It is further probable that the Picts and the Britons
of Strathclyde, united by speaking P-Celtic and possibly sharing
oral and other traditions, united to fight against both the
encroaching Angles and the expanding power of Dalriada at
different times. Historical concentration on the leading personalities
mentioned in contemporary and near-contemporary sources has
tended to lead to over-simplification.
The name Britain has been derived from Welsh
Prythein, which like its Gaelic cognate Cruithne was a term
used for the Picts.
The Picts and the
Angles
Classical sources refer to Angles and other
Germanic tribal peoples raiding Roman Britain as early as
the 4th century. By the 6th century they had established themselves
in much of England founding two separate kingdoms in north-eastern
England/south-eastern Scotland. These were Bernicia and Deira
which merged under Aethelfrith into the Kingdom of Northumbria
in the 590s. From this time on Northumbria adopted a policy
of aggressive expansion, defeating the men of the Gododdin,
possibly at Catterick around 600 AD and the Dalriadan Scots
at Degsastan in 603 AD.
During most of the 7th century Northumbrian
kings were the strongest rulers in Britain. Aethelfrith was
followed by Edwin, Oswald, Oswiu and Ecgfrith. Under the last
two Northumbrian expansion to the north reached its peak despite
dynastic marriages with the Britons, Picts and Scots. Their
supremacy was underlined at the Synod of Whitby when the Celtic
Church was superceded by the power of Rome in most of Britain.
Around 640 AD, under Oswald, they began pushing north, at
least as far as the Forth filling the vacuum created by the
collapse of the Gododdin and further strengthening their position.
Central Scotland was much fought over in
this period but by 672 AD Talorcan, Oswald's nephew was king
over at least the southern Picts and seems to have been under
Northumbrian control. That year saw a major revolt among the
Picts against this situation which was ruthlessly suppressed.
However the Picts were not finished yet and when Bruide mac
Bile became king the situation was set for further conflict.
In 685 AD the Northumbrians were led deep into Pictish territory
and slaughtered at Dunnichen, a battle which ended their expansionism
and laid the basis for the eventual amalgamation of the Scots
and Picts and the subsequent creation of the kingdom of Alba
which in time became Scotland.
The Battle of Dunnichen
At 3pm on 20th May 685 AD according to Irish
annal sources and Bede's history, a battle took place at Dunnichen,
near the village of Letham near Forfar in Angus. From the
late 650's Northumbrian influence over Pictland had continued
to grow till the Battle of Carron circa 672 AD in which the
Angles, under their king Ecgfrith totally routed the Pictish
army and took control of much Pictish territory. Ecgfrith
continued an active policy of expansionism in all directions
and it seems likely that the Picts were not capable of facing
up to him again till 685 AD. That spring Ecgfrith came north
again, probably expecting another decisive victory like that
of the Battle of Carron. However king Bruide of the Picts
had laid his plans well and the Northumbrian army was led
deep into the Pictish province of Circinn, probably by the
classic tactic of a small band fighting and then running.
It is now thought that the Northumbrian army was eventually
lured into the area between the fortified hill of Dun Nechtan
(Dunnichen) and the boggy ground known as Nechtan's Mere or
Linn Garan, the Pool of the Herons. Here the fleeing Picts
turned on Ecgfrith's troops and others probably came upon
them from behind, while yet more Pictish warriors poured down
from the hill-fort.
n
Aberlemno, a few miles from Letham there is a magnificent
Pictish Cross-slab depicting a battle, the details of
which support the contention that it represents the
Battle of Dunnichen, although the stone is thought to
be a half century or so later than the battle.
(right) The Aberlemno Battlescen.e
In the ensuing battle the Northumbrians were routed,
suffering many casualties including the death of their
king. Effectively this rout put an end to Northumbrian
expansionism and ensured the continuance of the Kingdom
of the Picts which in time combined with Scottish Dalriada
to form Scotland. |
|
The Picts and the Norse.
In 793 AD a group of Viking raiders
attacked the monastery of Lindisfarne in Northumbria
heralding the start of a long period of raids on Scotland's
coastal areas with occasional forays into the centre
of the country. These Germanic-speaking warriors from
Scandinavia were in many ways similar to the indigenous
peoples but were possessed of one specific tactical
advantage - their longships - equally efficient on sea
or river. |
|
Over the next century or so the Norsemen
took over territory in many parts of the British Isles and
were successful in wresting much of northern Scotland from
Pictish control. They took Orkney and Shetland, many of the
Hebrides, Caithness and much of Sutherland. In 839 AD a battle
took place between the Norsemen and a combined force of Picts
and Scots, probably led by Eoganan, king of both peoples.
He was killed along with many of the ruling dynasties of both
peoples and it might have been this that led to the way becoming
open for Kenneth MacAlpin to ascend the Dalriadan throne in
the next year. Such a defeat probably gave some impetus towards
the amalgamation of the Picts and Scots - uniting against
an outside invader usually brings related tribes together
even when they normally fight each other. At various times
in the 9th century the Norsemen seem to have come very close
to overrunning and perhaps permanently conquering much of
Scotland. The outcome of this was the eventual establishment
of the Gall-Gael (stranger Gael) kingdoms of the West and
the eventual Lordship of the Isles, as the invaders turned
into settlers. Within a century or so of their initial raids
the Norsemen were settled in Galloway, the Western Isles,
Man and Dublin and were becoming involved in marriages with
the established dynasties. The Norsemen had their own style
of rock art - the most common in Scotland being the hogback
memorial stones.
 |
|
(above) A Norse style hogback stone from
Govan, Strathclyde.The continuing Viking raids over the ensuing
centuries gave rise to many traditional tales associating
the Pictish Symbol Stones with Danish or Viking invaders,
the most notable being Sueno's Stone at Forres on the Moray
coast which probably really represents a battle between southern
forces of Scots, or Picts and Scots, and the Men of Moray,
long the northern focus of Pictish affairs.
|
|