| Celtic Scotland
by Ian Armit (Batsford, London/Historic Scotland, Edinburgh. 1997).
128pp; £15.99pb, £25.00hb; ISBN 0 7134 7538 2(pb), 0
7134 7537 4(hb).
In 1883 Joseph Anderson published the first, and
until now the last, general survey of the archaeology of Iron Age
Scotland – Scotland in Pagan Times: The Iron Age. Since then,
although the subject has received treatment as part of more extensive
surveys (notably in The Iron Age in North Britain, edited by A.L.F.
Rivet in 1966), no book has appeared solely devoted to the subject,
which is perhaps strange, given the wealth of impressive remains
from the period.
This volume is the last to be published in the
period surveys in the Batsford/Historic Scotland series that began
with Scotland’s First Settlers and now extends to Medieval
Scotland. The series as a whole has been excellent, as have the
related subject-studies in the same format. This book is no exception.
It is written in no-nonsense English and tells you what you want
to know, not what archaeologists feel you ought to know, which unfortunately
the writers of most popular books tend to do, conscious of peer-group
criticism. The arrangement is logical — after a first chapter
trying to set Scotland in a wider Celtic perspective (though do
we need to have the statutory map of Celtic Europe, reproduced as
fig 3, which with its clear boundaries seems to run a bit contrary
to the argument of the text?), the second chapter goes on to look
at the Bronze Age background of Iron Age Scotland. Chapters follow
on ‘House and Home’, ‘Warring Celts’ (mostly
about hillforts), ‘Celtic Cowboys’ (about farms), ‘Identity
and Power’, ‘Death and Belief’, ‘The Clash
with Rome’ and a Dark Age (and thus Pictish!) ‘Epilogue’
which points out that the early medieval period is really only an
extension of later prehistory.
Particularly useful are the reconstruction drawings,
which are perhaps less crude than some in the Batsford volumes,
though as always in this series many of the pictures are reproduced
too large, and others too small. Some of the colour plates seem
strange choices, notably the reconstruction drawings in plates 1
and 9, which do not require colour.
There are, inevitably, a few errors, such as the
caption to fig. 48 which informs us that the Crichton souterrain
was built partly from Roman dressed stone around 150 BC, and areas
where not all would agree with the interpretations put forward,
but these do not substantially detract from a very useful volume.
Lloyd Laing.
|