Celtic Key Patterns
by lain Bain (Constable, 1993). 88 ps HB, £12.95, PB, £7.95
lain Bain's new book is a detailed manual of the
construction of Celtic key patterns, and is also a convenient source
of reference about the many variations of key pattern to be found
around Britain.
Celtic Key Patterns complements the same author's
previous work on Celtic Knotwork (Constable, 1986), and deals simply
with the practicalities of construction, steering clear of speculation
about any meaning or symbolism behind the patterns. At first glance
the designs may appear complex, but the methods of construction
are set out step by step and are illustrated at each stage by clear
diagrams. The book can be a rewarding challenge for the contemporary
artist or craftsperson working in the Celtic style, and Bain's methods
of construction can give satisfling results in terms of new designs.
Using the methods described, key patterns can be translated onto
any desired surface, and this introduces many exciting potential
uses.
The book is punctuated by colour reproductions
of pages from the Lindisfarne Gospels and the Book of Kells which
give examples of key pattern as used by the ancient artists. These
provide inspiration for the present day worker, and suggest potential
applications for the use of the essentially simple but infinitely
variable key patterns. Some black and white photographs of Scottish
carved stones decorated with simple or complex key pattern are also
included in the text. Some of these photos are of casts rather than
originals. The pages from The Early Christian Monuments of Scotland
containing J R Alan's still very useful analysis of key pattern
are reproduced as an appendix.
In a short introduction (x) the author confesses
to a "nagging doubt" about the use of the word "Celtic"
in the title, since: "The Lindisfarne Gospels were written
in the monastery of Lindisfarne [and there] is evidence that the
Books of Kells and Durrow were written there also. " Lindisfarne
is one of the few Dark Age manuscripts whose provenance is certain,
but most scholars would now attribute Durrow and Kells to a Celtic
scriptorium, most probably iona. There is further confusion in the
description of the related stone carvings in an area ranging ".
. from Caithness in Scotland to Humberside and beyond . . [which]
huge area was the land of the Picts, which suggests that the Saxons
conquered an already cultured race".
The historical howlers in this passage hardly need
to be pointed out. The author is on much firmer ground when he calls
for the creation of original work using his methods: "I earnestly
plead that non-standard key patterns must be practised once the
construction methods are understood". It is indeed time that
more original (or at the least historically accurate) work in the
Celtic medium was produced, and not tourist trinkets decorated with
feeble copies of the motifs in the books on Celtic art by the author
or his father.
James Gillon-Fergusson and Niall M Robertson.
|